October 24, 2024
America Needs Clear Standards for China Tech Decoupling
Last month, the Biden administration proposed a rule to effectively sweep Chinese cars from the U.S. market. If enacted, the rule would ban the sale or import of any “connected vehicle” with certain Chinese technology. Today’s cars are essentially smartphones on wheels, equipped with increasingly sophisticated external connections, software, and sensors that constantly monitor the world around them. The administration rightly worries that Beijing could exploit these underlying technologies to turn American vehicles into unwitting surveillance vans for the Chinese Communist Party—or worse, to hijack them entirely.
Policymakers are slowly awaking to a rise in China’s cyber threat and the United States’ digital vulnerability. If there is a growing consensus to expand the country’s decoupling from Chinese tech, however, there is still no clear vision for how to do so responsibly.
This broad, virtually unchecked authority to ban Chinese apps and products resembles more of a loaded gun than a considered policy.
Washington must soon move beyond ad hoc bans against specific apps (such as TikTok) and categories (such as connected vehicles) and articulate a broader policy that identifies clear risks and limiting principles to inform which Chinese technologies Washington can tolerate in the U.S. market, and which it cannot. Absent this, policymakers risk barreling toward an improvisational, potentially vast tech decoupling from China with poorly understood consequences for American consumers, industry, and foreign policy.
The absence of a clear risk mitigation framework for Chinese tech creates uncertainty for the businesses, factories, and farmers who rightly wonder if their Chinese-linked products and components will be the next mole that Washington decides to whack. Today’s vague and easily abused executive power to ban Chinese tech also gives Beijing pretext to justify its own arbitrary restrictions on the $154 billion of U.S. exports to its massive market.
Read the full article on Foreign Policy.
More from CNAS
-
The United States Must Avoid AI’s Chernobyl Moment
Commentary
The United States cannot let speculative fears trigger heavy-handed regulations that would cripple U.S. AI innovation....
By Janet Egan
-
Lawfare Daily: Tim Fist and Arnab Datta on the Race to Build AI Infrastructure in America
Podcast
Tim Fist, senior adjunct fellow with the Technology and National Security Program at the Center for New American Security, and Arnab Datta, Director of Infrastructure Policy a...
By Tim Fist
-
Expect Trump Administration to Come Down Hard on Chip Exports, Says Chinatalk’s Jordan Schneider
Video
Jordan Schneider, an adjunct fellow at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) and MCC Global’s Michelle Caruso-Cabrera, join ‘Power Lunch’ to discuss the chips trade an...
By Jordan Schneider
-
International Governance of AI
Video
Ruby Scanlon, research assistant for the Technology and National Security Program at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), partook in a panel which discussed the comp...
By Ruby Scanlon
