May 30, 2018

Artificial Intelligence, International Competition, and the Balance of Power

In early September 2017, Russian President Vladimir Putin brought artificial intelligence from the labs of Silicon Valley, academia, and the basement of the Pentagon to the forefront of international politics. “Artificial intelligence is the future, not only for Russia, but for all humankind,” he said. “It comes with colossal opportunities, but also threats that are difficult to predict. Whoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world.”

Putin’s remarks reflect a belief, growing in sectors and regions across the world, that advances in artificial intelligence will be critical for the future — in areas as varied as work, society, and military power. Artificial intelligence is a critical element of what Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, calls the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Eric Schmidt, the former CEO of Google, argues that artificial intelligence is so important to the future of power that the United States needs a national strategy on artificial intelligence, just as it had one for the development of space technology during the Cold War. Elon Musk, the head of Tesla and SpaceX, has even said that growth in artificial intelligence technology, left unchecked, could risk sparking World War III. These statements suggest that artificial intelligence will have a large and potentially deterministic influence on global politics and the balance of power.


Read the Full Article at the Texas National Security Review

  • Commentary
    • Lieber Institute
    • February 19, 2025
    Ukraine Symposium – The Continuing Autonomous Arms Race

    This war-powered technology race does not appear to be losing steam, and what happens on the battlefields of Ukraine can potentially define how belligerents use military auton...

    By Samuel Bendett

  • Commentary
    • Lawfare
    • February 14, 2025
    Beyond DeepSeek: How China’s AI Ecosystem Fuels Breakthroughs

    While the United States should not mimic China’s state-backed funding model, it also can’t leave AI’s future to the market alone....

    By Ruby Scanlon

  • Reports
    • February 13, 2025
    Averting AI Armageddon

    In recent years, the previous bipolar nuclear order led by the United States and Russia has given way to a more volatile tripolar one, as China has quantitatively and qualitat...

    By Jacob Stokes, Colin H. Kahl, Andrea Kendall-Taylor & Nicholas Lokker

  • Commentary
    • CEPA
    • February 13, 2025
    France Pursues an AI “Third Way”

    This AI third way is not AI sovereignty in a traditional sense, which at a high level is a nation’s policy of placing the development, deployment, and control of AI models, in...

    By Pablo Chavez

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia