May 30, 2023

China Is Flirting With AI Catastrophe

Few early observers of the Cold War could have imagined that the worst nuclear catastrophe of the era would occur at an obscure power facility in Ukraine. The 1986 Chernobyl disaster was the result of a flawed nuclear reactor design and a series of mistakes made by the plant operators. The fact that the world’s superpowers were spiraling into an arms race of potentially world-ending magnitude tended to eclipse the less obvious dangers of what was, at the time, an experimental new technology. And yet despite hair-raising episodes such as the Cuban missile crisis of 1962, it was a failure of simple safety measures, exacerbated by authoritarian crisis bungling, that resulted in the uncontrolled release of 400 times the radiation emitted by the U.S. nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. Estimates of the devastation from Chernobyl range from hundreds to tens of thousands of premature deaths from radiation—not to mention an “exclusion zone” that is twice the size of London and remains largely abandoned to this day.

Today’s AI sprint would not be the first time Beijing’s desire to hasten progress invited disaster.

As the world settles into a new era of rivalry­—this time between China and the United States—competition over another revolutionary technology, artificial intelligence, has sparked a flurry of military and ethical concerns parallel to those initiated by the nuclear race. Those concerns are well worth the attention they are receiving, and more: a world of autonomous weapons and machine-speed war could have devastating consequences for humanity. Beijing’s use of AI tools to help fuel its crimes against humanity against the Uyghur people in Xinjiang already amounts to a catastrophe.

Read the full article from Foreign Affairs.

  • Commentary
    • Lawfare
    • February 14, 2025
    Beyond DeepSeek: How China’s AI Ecosystem Fuels Breakthroughs

    While the United States should not mimic China’s state-backed funding model, it also can’t leave AI’s future to the market alone....

    By Ruby Scanlon

  • Reports
    • February 13, 2025
    Averting AI Armageddon

    In recent years, the previous bipolar nuclear order led by the United States and Russia has given way to a more volatile tripolar one, as China has quantitatively and qualitat...

    By Jacob Stokes, Colin H. Kahl, Andrea Kendall-Taylor & Nicholas Lokker

  • Commentary
    • CEPA
    • February 13, 2025
    France Pursues an AI “Third Way”

    This AI third way is not AI sovereignty in a traditional sense, which at a high level is a nation’s policy of placing the development, deployment, and control of AI models, in...

    By Pablo Chavez

  • Commentary
    • The Spectator
    • February 10, 2025
    How Can We Develop AI That Helps, Rather Than Harms, People?

    In every technological revolution, we face a choice: build for freedom or watch as others build for control. With AI the stakes couldn’t be higher. It already mediates 20 per ...

    By Brendan McCord

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia