February 10, 2025
How Can We Develop AI That Helps, Rather Than Harms, People?
In every technological revolution, we face a choice: build for freedom or watch as others build for control. With AI the stakes couldn’t be higher. It already mediates 20 per cent of our waking hours through smartphones, automated systems, and digital interfaces. Soon it will touch nearly every aspect of human existence. While AI promises to liberate us for higher pursuits by “extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking,” history – from the iron cage of Soviet bureaucracy to modern Chinese surveillance – serves as a stark warning that automation can just as easily erode our freedoms and condition us to passively accept social control.
Today’s debate about AI’s future is dominated by competing visions of control. Doomsayers, like some of those at this week’s AI Action Summit in France, advocate for strict controls (even “pauses” on all development) that would forfeit progress while inviting tyranny.
Read the full article on The Spectator.
More from CNAS
-
The United States Must Avoid AI’s Chernobyl Moment
The United States cannot let speculative fears trigger heavy-handed regulations that would cripple U.S. AI innovation....
By Janet Egan
-
Lawfare Daily: Tim Fist and Arnab Datta on the Race to Build AI Infrastructure in America
Tim Fist, senior adjunct fellow with the Technology and National Security Program at the Center for New American Security, and Arnab Datta, Director of Infrastructure Policy a...
By Tim Fist
-
International Governance of AI
Ruby Scanlon, research assistant for the Technology and National Security Program at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), partook in a panel which discussed the comp...
By Ruby Scanlon
-
As Trump Reshapes AI Policy, Here’s How He Could Protect America’s AI Advantage
The nation that solidifies its AI advantage will shape the trajectory of the most transformative technology of our era....
By Janet Egan, Paul Scharre & Vivek Chilukuri