December 13, 2021
How France Can Promote EU Interests in the UN Security Council
In January, France will take over the rotating presidency of the European Union, securing an opportunity to set the EU agenda. One key ambition for the French presidency will be to transform the bloc into a more capable geopolitical actor.
Paris already plans to hold a Summit on European Defense in February and will unveil the Union’s highly anticipated Strategic Compass document in March.
Within this context, there has recently been speculation—including from the spokesman of President Emmanuel Macron’s party in the National Assembly—about France transferring its permanent United Nations Security Council seat to the European Union.
Yet political and legal constraints make this unlikely in the short term. Instead, EU leaders should consider alternative arrangements that would accomplish similar goals.
France and Britain have consistently supported Germany in its bid for a permanent UNSC seat. However, these bids were opposed by some other EU member states (especially Italy) and the United States.
Permanent seat holders in the European Union (namely only France after Brexit) must foster EU interests when fulfilling their duties.
As a result, then-Vice Chancellor Olaf Scholz alternatively called for the conversion of the existing French permanent seat into an EU seat, building off of France and Germany’s then-upcoming shared presidency of the UNSC to promote EU positions and commitments in the UNSC.
As the European Union is a supranational union, it legally cannot have its own permanent seat on the UNSC. Instead, the European Union delegates its decision-making authority to member states that are in the UNSC.
Consequently, Scholz’s proposal noted that a permanent EU seat would remain a de jure French seat.
Scholz’s proposal was opposed by France, which argued that it already takes EU positions “into consideration” in the UNSC. Furthermore, the EU delegation arrangement allows France to take a proactive stance in the UNSC when the rest of the European Union has not reached consensus yet, ensuring a timely response to any emerging international crises.
Read the full story from Euractiv.
More from CNAS
-
Trump and the War in Ukraine with Michael Kofman and Robert Lee
Podcast
More than 1000 days into the War in Ukraine, questions about continued support for the Ukrainian effort and the prospect of a negotiated settlement in the months to come have ...
By Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Jim Townsend, Rob Lee & Mike Kofman
-
RUSI Recording: The Impact of the U.S. Presidential Election on European Security
Video
Jim Townsend, an adjunct senior fellow in the CNAS Transatlantic Security Program, joins RUSI to discuss the impact the next US presidential administration will have on NATO, ...
By Jim Townsend
-
Sharper: Trump 2.0
Commentary
Donald Trump's return to the White House is widely expected to reshape America's global priorities. With personnel choices and policy agendas that mark a significant break fro...
By Charles Horn & Gwendolyn Nowaczyk
-
More Escalation in Ukraine: British Missiles and U.S. Land Mines
Podcast
Jim Townsend, adjunct senior fellow in the Center for a New American Security Transatlantic Security Program, joins to discuss British long-range missiles and U.S. land mines ...
By Jim Townsend
