December 26, 2020

Landmark artificial intelligence legislation should become law

Tucked away in the 4,517-page annual defense bill awaiting signature is an overlooked piece of legislation on artificial intelligence (AI).

Don’t worry, America. It doesn’t make every military weapon system autonomous or require brigades of robotic infantry. Instead, it’s a sensible, 63-page plan establishing a civilian-led initiative to coordinate and accelerate investments in “trustworthy” artificial intelligence systems across the federal government. In passing this legislation, the United States Congress has demonstrated that it collectively realizes that AI will be transformative, and that urgent research and development is needed to ensure the United States remains the world leader in AI.

AI will touch every sector — from agriculture to healthcare, to transportation to national security.

Make no mistake, the “National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020,” also dubbed as “Division E” of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), is the closest thing to a national strategy on AI from the United States to be formally endorsed by Congress. Division E required painstaking negotiations and bipartisan sign-off from nearly 20 committees. The fact that this many committees — each with different jurisdictions, staff, and personalities — in Congress had their handprints on this legislation is a reminder of how difficult moving a bill through the legislative process actually is; but more importantly, it is an indicator of how significant and far-reaching AI technology will be on our society and the economy. It will touch every sector — from agriculture to healthcare, to transportation to national security — and every individual will be impacted in some form or fashion whether it be their jobs, privacy, safety, or livelihood.

Read the full article in The Hill.

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Policy
    • October 24, 2024
    America Needs Clear Standards for China Tech Decoupling

    This broad, virtually unchecked authority to ban Chinese apps and products resembles more of a loaded gun than a considered policy....

    By Vivek Chilukuri

  • Podcast
    • October 22, 2024
    What Is ‘Sovereign AI’ Anyway?

    Pablo Chavez, Adjunct Senior Fellow with CNAS's Technology and National Security Program, joins POLITICO Tech to discuss how the term “sovereign AI” gets thrown around a lot i...

    By Pablo Chavez

  • Podcast
    • October 17, 2024
    U.S. Chip Controls and the Future of AI Compute

    That escalated quickly! Emily and Geoff discuss why the U.S. aim to deny China access to the computing power necessary for frontier AI capabilities has led to an ever expandin...

    By Emily Kilcrease, Geoffrey Gertz & Pablo Chavez

  • Podcast
    • October 11, 2024
    Asymmetry and AI: The Battle for Power

    Paul Scharre, Vice President and Director of Studies at CNAS, joins Zero Pressure to discuss the world of asymmetric warfare, a term used to describe imbalances in conflict. F...

    By Paul Scharre

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia