February 12, 2018

Strategic Innovation and Great Power Competition

At this time of disruptive transitions, the new U.S. National Defense Strategy rightly recognizes that the character of warfare is changing due to the advent of a range of disruptive technologies.[1,2] In particular, the strategy highlights rapid advances in advanced computing, big data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), autonomy, robotics, directed energy, hypersonics, and biotechnology, which are characterized as “the very technologies that ensure we will be able to fight and win the wars of the future.”[3] The emergence of and unique convergences among these technologies could transform current paradigms of military power in uncertain, unpredictable ways. In addition, since commercial developments have been a primary driver of recent progress in many of these disparate technologies, the diffusion of advances will occur much more quickly and prove difficult to constrain, especially with the free exchange of ideas and talent across borders. In recent history, military-technical advantage has been a key pillar of U.S. military predominance. However, today’s trends, including China’s rapid emergence as a scientific powerhouse, seem unlikely to allow for the U.S. or perhaps any actor to achieve uncontested edge, and poor policy choices could lead to disadvantage.

Read the full article in Strategy Bridge.

  • Commentary
    • TIME
    • February 20, 2025
    As Trump Reshapes AI Policy, Here’s How He Could Protect America’s AI Advantage

    The nation that solidifies its AI advantage will shape the trajectory of the most transformative technology of our era....

    By Janet Egan, Paul Scharre & Vivek Chilukuri

  • Commentary
    • Lieber Institute
    • February 19, 2025
    Ukraine Symposium – The Continuing Autonomous Arms Race

    This war-powered technology race does not appear to be losing steam, and what happens on the battlefields of Ukraine can potentially define how belligerents use military auton...

    By Samuel Bendett

  • Commentary
    • Lawfare
    • February 14, 2025
    Beyond DeepSeek: How China’s AI Ecosystem Fuels Breakthroughs

    While the United States should not mimic China’s state-backed funding model, it also can’t leave AI’s future to the market alone....

    By Ruby Scanlon

  • Reports
    • February 13, 2025
    Averting AI Armageddon

    In recent years, the previous bipolar nuclear order led by the United States and Russia has given way to a more volatile tripolar one, as China has quantitatively and qualitat...

    By Jacob Stokes, Colin H. Kahl, Andrea Kendall-Taylor & Nicholas Lokker

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia