June 07, 2018

China's Economic Coercion and the Potential U.S. Response

Neil Bhatiya, Research Associate in the Energy, Economics, and Security Program, leads a discussion on China's use of coercive economic measures and how the United States can respond with Elizabeth Rosenberg, Senior Fellow and Director of the EES Program, Peter Harrell, Adjunct Senior Fellow in the EES Program, and Edoardo Saravalle, Researcher in the EES Program. The discussants draw on the findings from their upcoming report "China's Use of Coercive Economic Measures" and cover issues including: past examples of Chinese coercive measures, how Beijing chooses its targets, how its coercion differs from the U.S. measures, and how Washington can counter this threat.

  • Video
    • January 20, 2025
    Ziemba: Trump to Rely on Gulf Partners to Diffuse Tension

    After 15 months of fighting, ceasefire has taken effect between Israel and Hamas, ahead of President-elect Donald Trump's inauguration. Rachel Ziemba, Founder of Ziemba Insigh...

    By Rachel Ziemba

  • Commentary
    • January 20, 2025
    Articulate a Clear Tariff Roadmap

    The administration should develop a tariff roadmap that defines and prioritizes the policy goals that tariffs are intended to advance.The administration should have specific, ...

    By Emily Kilcrease

  • Commentary
    • January 20, 2025
    Launch Economic Security Agreements

    The Trump administration should launch a new type of trade agreement to advance shared economic security objectives with close U.S. partners...

    By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz

  • Commentary
    • January 20, 2025
    Publish an Economic Security Strategy

    The Trump administration should publish an official economic security strategy that sets a vision for the U.S. role in the global economy...

    By Geoffrey Gertz & Emily Kilcrease

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia