May 07, 2024

Why the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. has been getting busier

It’s been a couple weeks since President Joe Biden signed a bill into law that will require ByteDance, the Chinese company that owns the social media app TikTok, to sell it off by January or face an outright ban in the United States.

The case is a little unusual, because the details of deciding whether or not a foreign company can invest in a U.S. business, or own it outright, is usually left to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS.

The committee is made of representatives from a grab bag of government agencies with big national security responsibilities, including the departments of Defense and Homeland Security, and agencies with economic and commercial responsibilities, including the Commerce Department and the U.S. Trade Representatives’ office.

The committee’s goal is to look at foreign investment and figure out whether it raises any national security issues, said Emily Kilcrease, director of the energy, economics and security program at the Center for a New American Security. She used to be a staffer at the Trade Representative’s office and the Commerce Department, and has represented both agencies on CFIUS.

Then the committee will decide whether to make changes to the deal in order to assuage the government’s concerns.

“It’s kind of a flexible definition of national security, and it can take into consideration economic considerations, but it always has to come back to a national security risk,” Kilcrease said.

For example, a foreign company that wants to buy an American military supplier might present a national security risk. Kilcrease said there’s a wide range of transactions where the government might have national security concerns.

“Protection of critical infrastructure, including cybersecurity elements — that counts as national security,” Kilcrease said. “We’re worried about supply chains more broadly these days. So that would certainly be something that would be considered national security.”

Listen to the full segment from Marketplace.

  • Commentary
    • Sharper
    • November 20, 2024
    Sharper: Trump 2.0

    Donald Trump's return to the White House is widely expected to reshape America's global priorities. With personnel choices and policy agendas that mark a significant break fro...

    By Charles Horn & Gwendolyn Nowaczyk

  • Podcast
    • November 14, 2024
    Trump 2.0's Economic Security Agenda

    Emily and Geoff switch from obsessing over the election to obsessing over the transition. They dig into what a Trump 2.0 presidency will mean for tariffs, sanctions, export co...

    By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz

  • Commentary
    • The Washington Post
    • November 14, 2024
    Biden’s Gloves Can Finally Come Off to Help Trump End the Ukraine War

    The Biden administration’s reasons to treat Russian oil with kid gloves, in other words, no longer apply....

    By Edward Fishman

  • Podcast
    • November 13, 2024
    European Security and Defense under Trump 2.0 with Andrea Kendall-Taylor and Jim Townsend

    Max and Donatienne are joined by Andrea Kendall-Taylor and Jim Townsend, hosts of the Brussels Sprouts podcast at the Center for a New American Security, to discuss the implic...

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor & Jim Townsend

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia